Cancer is an infinitely worse problem for the medical establishment.

This article is to encourage the reader to seriously reflect on a very serious topic. With Jade Goodie in the headline, now is a good time to air this issue. To start we will talk a little about conventional medicine and its processes.

Principles of cancer staging and diagnosis.

Diagnosis and staging are vital in determining optimal management. There are several ways to obtain the samples. There are – scrapings of tissue from body surfaces such as the cervix. -Fine needle aspiration: -Needle biopsy: -Incisional biopsy: -Excisional biopsy, to name a few.

Samples are often stained and viewed under a microscope. This allows the doctor to determine the optimal treatment and obtain prognostic information. These processes are supported by a complete clinical examination. Other investigations used are X-rays, ultrasounds, isotope scans, CT scans, MRIs, PET scans, aspirates. Naturally, the doctor wants to measure the dimensions of the tumor and identify the exact location for possible surgery.

Tumor marker assays are commonly used – these are proteins associated with so-called ‘malignancy’. A list of some: – Estrogen receptor and CA15-3 – Breast cancer. Carcinoembryonic (CEA) in colorectal. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) – prostate. CA125 in ovarian cancer. CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer. Alpha fetoprotein (AFP). Beta human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase in testicular teratoma and seminoma. Thyroglobulin in follicular carcinoma of the thyroid. Calcitonin in medullary thyroid carcinoma. S100 in melanoma and neuroendocrine tumors. VMA in pheochromocytoma (adrenal medulla).

These markers help with diagnosis, but they are not always a 100% complete test.

The myth that chemotherapy helps.

Chemotherapy was the brainchild of a guy who noticed that mustard gas killed rapidly dividing living cells. Chemotherapy is a cousin of mustard gas. Billions of pounds later there has been very little improvement in survival rates since 1971. Part of the reason for the poor success is that in vitro studies are totally different from in vivo studies. What there has been is a massage of statistics.

One of the few studies comparing chemotherapy with another form of treatment, tamoxifen: there was no improvement in survival rates compared to taking tamoxifen alone (The Lancet, 1996; 347: 1066-71). There is no evidence that it helps any of these cancers: liver, rectum, small cell cancer, colon, and bladder. Why is it given, who benefits?

Have you ever compared cancer patients who get chemotherapy with those who don’t?

They’ve never done a study where cancer patients are left alone and survival rates are compared to those on chemotherapy. The medical establishment would argue that not treating cancer patients is unethical. This argument is based on the assumption that chemotherapy helps. How do we know that it is chemotherapy that takes care of those who survive? They admit that they don’t know what causes cancer, so the reader will surely agree that there may be other factors at play.

A study published in Natural News on February 2, 2009 showed that chemotherapy hastened death in some people.

Now, with the discovery of Metamedicine, we can begin to answer these questions. With an understanding of the two phases of the disease, we now know that some growths appear in the first phase (active conflict) and others in the second (resolved conflict). When it appears in the second phase, the hands and feet will be warm and the appetite good. The opposite is true when conflict is active. When it comes to growths in the healing phase, the last thing you need is chemotherapy, as it pushes the patient back into the conflict phase, as evidenced by the effects on appetite. Also, the growth slowdown is not due to the chemotherapy, but because the healing has now been interrupted and will have to resume at some point. While the conflict is active, as in pulmonary alveolar tumors, chemotherapy accelerates death since it aggravates the sympathaconia, that is, it accelerates stress innervation.

Metastasis is a hypothesis!

This cannot be emphasized enough. METASTASIS is an unproven HYPOTHESIS. With the understanding of this new discovery, we now have a new perspective. The main cause of the secondary ones is the diagnosis and the prognostic implications given to the patients by their doctor. In other words, millions are signing their death warrants by going to their doctor who does not understand the connection of the psyche with the organ. There is a saying “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

The conflict of “fear of death” affects the lung. Unfortunately, the foci appear instantly, so when the specialist does an x-ray of the lung, he sees a shadow. He claims that the original injury has spread. Unfortunately, it was often the ‘cancer’ diagnosis that triggered the new conflict.

This guy I met told how this nurse screamed when she spilled chemo on her hand. The matron hastened to calm her down. They then moved to inject it into this boy saying that he behaves differently in the blood stream than he does on the skin. You can imagine his thoughts at that moment.

Oncologists will not touch their own poison.

Another cancer patient I knew found studies showing that most oncologists wouldn’t touch chemotherapy with a barge pole and certainly wouldn’t give it to their families. 58 out of 72 would not and she believed the other 14 said they would to save face. This type of statement is generally quite well known or at least should be and I encourage the reader to check it out for themselves.

In light of what was just said, people have questioned this. When oncologists were asked:

“Knowing that the chances of a successful outcome with chemotherapy are slim to none in many cancer cases, why do you continue to prescribe chemotherapy?”

The answer he got was this: “We give it to patients so they don’t get discouraged and fall into the hands of charlatans.” Who are the charlatans you may ask!

With the scientific understanding of metamedicine, it’s hard not to be biased. Just as we look back at the practices of the 1700s and are horrified, future generations will say the same thing about chemotherapy.

Meanwhile the holocaust continues in the name of the huge profits of the pharmaceutical industry. I say holocaust because there is a deliberate suppression of Dr. Hamer’s discovery. Arrest warrants have been issued against him in Europe and he lives in hiding outside the EU without wanting to return to prison for the third time. Ignorance is one thing, deliberate suppression another.

As an example of gains: Researchers at the National Cancer Institute used data from Medicare’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to examine the costs of initial cancer treatments in 306,709 breast cancer patients, colorectal, pulmonary and prostate cancer during the age of 65 years. Over the ten-year period studied, the average cost of breast cancer treatment increased from $4,189 to $20,964. The average cost of treating prostate cancer increased from $5,435 to $41,134, while the average cost of treating lung cancer increased from $7,139 to $39,891. (Gutiérrez,D 2008). Who pays, we the taxpayers.

The animals have high survival rates and rarely get any side effects. Of course, oncologists don’t ask about this, more often relying on the results obtained through rodent torture to inform their decisions. They say that formaldehyde is carcinogenic. Formaldehyde does not cause cancer, it is the conflict that the animal suffers from torture.

To do?

One of the best things a doctor can do is free their patients from the insidious and fearful consensus field of their illness, which unfortunately is what the medical establishment promotes.

Our loved ones quietly sneak into hospital wards denied knowledge of Meta-Medicine and the new approach it brings to their illness. In the words of Dr. Hamer, “the man who invented chemotherapy should be given a monument in hell.”

Jade Goody is the classic example of what not to do. If done early enough, surgery can sometimes help.

Remember the same people cracking down on this are the same kind of people dumping depleted uranium where children live in Iraq and maiming millions upon thousands in Vietnam with Agent Orange. Now they give you and your family a derivative of mustard gas and tell you it will help you. Their greed knows no bounds, they are unscrupulous and love to be in control. Consent is created through manipulation of the media. Wake up!

To end this article, we leave you with a quote from a French professor of oncology, Professor George Mathe: “If I had cancer, I would never go to a standard cancer treatment center. Cancer patients who live far from the centers have an opportunity “.

Gutierrez, D (2008) Natural News (Cancer industry profits from chemotherapy as treatment costs soar)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *